Archive for February, 2006

The Comstock Films Video PodcastXana and Dax: When Opposites Attract, Episode 7

Monday, February 27th, 2006

Episode 7 of Xana and Dax: When Opposites Attract brings us what has been called “the most intimate 69 ever captured on film”. It’s certainly one of the most beautiful moments of mutual pleasure we’ve ever had the privilege of seeing, and it’s our privilege to offer it to you!

For your iPod or iTunes:
pcast://feeds.comstockfilms.com/ComstockFilmsVideoPodcast

All others:
http://feeds.comstockfilms.com/ComstockFilmsVideoPodcast

And don’t forget, if you like what you see, you can get the entire film on DVD from The Comstock Films DVD Shop.

Enjoy!

Sex films for the rest of us – Part 2

Friday, February 24th, 2006

In her recent “Op-Ed”, AVN’s Heidi Joy Pike writes:

“This is my main problem with many “couples” or “woman-friendly” smut stores that I enter. While there’s all the instruments of a good time present — most of these stores have a bitchin’ novelty section and even, in many cases, a superb BDSM supply section — but when it comes to the porno, well, the offerings often come up on the anemic side. I have the suspicion that it’s because too many “couples” retailers aren’t updating their concept of what couples really like to see these days. Sexually, people are more advanced than ever in their knowledge of what gets them off and more vocal about sharing that with their primary partner. While traditional, plot-based features may be able to serve their titillation needs, there’s the general fact that gonzo’s got the goods to fill those needs quickly.

“Plot-based stuff is thoughtful and gorgeous, but the basic fact is that many people don’t need to have some director’s vision of — as good as it might be — pirates or vampires in love to get off. Something uncomplicated taking place on a couch in Granada Hills with two people who fuck each other like they don’t care if the encounter will kill them both will do the job, too. It’s real stuff. The couch encounter is taking place in the real world, and it has an undeniable set of emotions that people can relate to. There are no characters diluting the lust, the fear, the wanting, the ambivalence, the drive. Nope, just real people feeling what they feel and fucking so other people can watch. No gorgeous locale and no Herculean amount of art direction can save a lackluster fuck, and all that effort to make things look like eighteenth century America for the fuck vid can really wipe the players out, resulting in sex that’s sometimes on the stale side.”

Great novelty section, superb BDSM equipment, “anemic porn section” – it sounds like Ms. Pike has just paid a visit to the newly open Babeland store in Los Angeles. But I think Heidi’s got it wrong as to why the porn section is “anemic”.

Have a look at these butt plugs from NjoyToys.com.

Njoy’s finely crafted beauties were conceived by a fellow with a background in the engineering and design of consumer products. They’re fabricated in a facility that also manufactures aerospace components. These are not “novelties”, they’re the latest in a growing world of highly refined pleasure instruments that are available in medical grade silicone, Pyrex, and now, thanks to Njoy, stainless steel!

Where once people had to be satisfied with flaccid (and vaguely off-putting) rubber phalluses from Doc Johnson Novelties, this new generation of pleasure instruments have raised the bar on what people expect when they plunk down their hard-earned cash for something nice to shove up their asses. No wonder the “couples” or “woman-friendly” smut stores that Heidi visits focus their attention on these sorts of products!

Now compare these lovingly made and altogether lovely sex toys to the “thoughtful and gorgeous” porn features that bore Ms. Pike, or the “two people who fuck each other like they don’t care if the encounter will kill them both” gonzos that she says many couples prefer. Do any of these videos look as well made and carefully crafted as one of Njoy’s beautiful butt plugs? Of course not! Making a film is an enormous undertaking, and there is simply no way to make a film that is anywhere near as refined as an Njoy plug on even the most lavish porn budget.

But now let’s set craft aside. You’re not actually going to shove a video up your ass, so it doesn’t have to be as polished as a butt plug. But what about the sincerity of the offering? When I pick up something from Njoy, or Fun Factory, or Pjur, I have no doubt that what I’m holding in my hands was made with the utmost consideration of what I’m going to do with it, that the plug or vibrator or lube is going be used in the most intimate of ways.

But when I put a porn DVD in the player, I don’t feel that way. In fact, I feel waves of cynicism and/or apathy (”It’s just porn”) pouring out of the scene – and this is true whether I’m watching a “two people who fuck each other like they don’t care if the encounter will kill them both” (charming way to put it, no?) gonzo or a “thoughtful and gorgeous” (?) plot-based porn feature.

So when Ms. Pike says that “No gorgeous locale and no Herculean amount of art direction can save a lackluster fuck, and all that effort to make things look like eighteenth century America for the fuck vid can really wipe the players out, resulting in sex that’s sometimes on the stale side.” I completely agree with her. From a producer’s point of view, it’s just plain silly to try to make an “epic” on a six-figure budget, and from a director’s point of view, it’s probably a bad idea to muck up a good story with too much sex, or muck up good sex with too much story.

But when she goes on to say that gonzo offers an “undeniable set of emotions that people can relate to”, I honestly wonder what she’s watching.

Mostly what I see in a typical gonzo flick is bunch of people paid to show up at a sparsely furnished nouveau-riche Southern California McMansion (in Granada Hills perhaps), take off their clothes, and fuck while someone records it all with a handicam. That’s not an engaging fantasy or an emotional situation that I can relate to.

I’d like to give the director and the performers the benefit of the doubt that some more is happening, and perhaps if I knew the players better (as I presume an industry insider like Ms. Pike does), I would see these videos as an unvarnished document of a lusty sport fuck. Sex for sex’s sake is hot—most of the sex my wife and I have it sex for sex’s sake!

But that’s not what I see when I watch these videos. And if that’s what’s actually happening on the set, it’s not being recorded and edited in a way that I can see it. Apparently the “couple” and “women-friendly” smut shops with “amemic porno selections” can’t see it either.

Of course for me, the whole discussion begs the question: What about those of us who aren’t turned on by “thoughtful and gorgeous” features or “two people who fuck each other like they don’t care if the encounter will kill them both” gonzo?” Are we even on Heidi’s radar? Or have we simply been written off as prudes who just have hang-ups about sex and porn?

15 years ago, I bet the folks at Doc Johnson thought the same thing about people who weren’t interested in the cadaverous, flesh-colored rubber dildos they wanted us to buy. Of course this simply wasn’t the case. We were just waiting for someone to offer us something better – something worthy of the privilage of being shoved up our ass. And thankfully they did, and now there’s a wealth of very lovely toys and lubes for people like us to choose from.

Of course Doc Johnson is still out there, probably doing better than ever, and you can buy their stuff if you want to too. The point is it’s no longer your only choice if you want to shove something up your butt. Do you think that 15 years from now “the rest of us” will have a wonderful variety of sex films to choose from too?

Abby Ehmann Does Tony Comstock

Wednesday, February 22nd, 2006

30+ years ago, New York was the epicenter of the newly born “mainstream porn”, and it was the heart of “porn chic”. But these days it’s more like a frontier outpost supporting a relatively small community of erotic artists. But that smallness isn’t neccesarily a bad thing.

In LA we might have been lost in the crowd, or squashed by the AVN hedgimony that dominates the adult industy out there. But here in New York we’re easy to find, which helps to explain the great run of press mentions we had in 2006, and seems off to a good start with this latest interview withAbby Ehmann, a freelance journalist and gal about town here in New York City.

A year ago her husband give Marie and Jack: A Hardcore Love Story a nice review in Penthouse Magazine, and last Spring she gave a very nice review to Xana and Dax: When Opposites Attract in Eros Zine.

A couple of weeks ago I spent some time talking with her about how this whole thing called Comstock Films got started, what I think makes what we do different, and where I hope we might be going. If you like our films, I think you’ll like the interview.

Abby Ehmann’s Eros Zine Interview with Tony Comstock

Enjoy!

“Sex films for the rest of us.”

Tuesday, February 21st, 2006

Time and again I’ve offered that one of the problems with “porn for women” is that it’s based on the idea that majority of the porn that’s out there is “porn for men”; and while it seems to be true that “mainstream porn” might mostly watched by men, it’s also true that mainstream porn leaves many (most?) men just as puzzled, bored, and/or offput as it leaves many (most?) women. So when a producer sets out to create “porn for women” by using “porn for men” as an antimodel, the results are often just as unengaging as “mainstream porn”, but for different reasons.

My experience has been that women like sex for more or less the same reasons that men do, and that where men and women seem to be different, those differences are as likely to be complimentary as combative – the idea that men and women want something so very different and incompatable from sex just isn’t supported by all the very enthusiastic fucking and sucking that’s going on all around us each and every day.

It doesn’t make any more sense to me that men and women want something so very different from porn.

With this in mind, you can see why I was thrilled when W.S. Cross blogged about our films in her post entitled “Sex Films for the Rest of Us”. Says Ms. Cross:

“I don’t like porn films.

“They’re boring. I don’t care if the people are “objectified,” and I think it should be clear by now you won’t find any reservations about sex on this site. It’s not that adult films are objectioonable on theoretical grounds, they’re just interesting…

…Director Comstock [is] clearly making movies for a different audience than the Chatsworth, CA adult film industry.”

Of course Ms. Cross is exactly right. I’m not making movies for the people who are content with the erotic output of the 818 area code. I’m making sex films for the rest of us.

The Comstock Films Video PodcastXana and Dax: When Opposites Attract, Episode 6

Monday, February 20th, 2006

Hello. It’s time for another installment of the Comstock Films Video Podcast.

This episode of “Xana and Dax: When Opposites Attract” take us further into Xana and Dax’s tender but passion lovemaking. A small glass of baby oil comes out to add some lubricity to the proceedings, and Xana and Dax’s hand and mouths feast on each other.

For your iPod or iTunes:
pcast://feeds.comstockfilms.com/ComstockFilmsVideoPodcast

All others:
http://feeds.comstockfilms.com/ComstockFilmsVideoPodcast

And don’t forget, if you like what you see, you can get the entire film on DVD from The Comstock Films DVD Shop.

Enjoy!

More Love for Damon and Hunter

Friday, February 17th, 2006

ManNet.com’s Brent Blue opens his review of Damon and Hunter: Doing it Together by saying:

“Damon DeMarco and Hunter James look like the gay couple next door in this very intimate rendering of sex. This isn’t really about porn, but lovemaking. As Damon says: “This is not about procreation.” It’s about their pleasure as a couple, which is exactly what the films attempts to capture, a very personal romantic coupling, simply shot so as to allow the full nature of the moments to stand on their own, rather than be washed over by the gloss of porn.”

It’s the p-word again. A reminder that even to people who like porn, it’s a word that means something, that while it may connect to the audience sexually, leaves some many other aspects of human need and desire unaddressed, or even belittled. A reminder of why I’ve grown uncomfortable with the word. But the other day, I saw something that reminded me why I fell in love with porn, and what drew me to wanting to make sexual art.

Somewhere on the vast internet (I’ve lost the link) someone post photos from an early 80s issue of Playboy; Girls of the Military I think it was. The women were, of course, pretty. But they weren’t caricatures of glamour, at least not to my eye. No, rather than seeming like confections of the photographer’s, stylist’s and surgeon’s skill, they seemed like the very beautiful women I see ever day; my daughter’s schoolmate’s mother, the college girls who life guard in the summer, my own wife.

I’ve undressed all of these women (and many others!) in my mind’s eye, and the images in my imagination are as lovingly crafted as these Playboy images were. The light is gentle and flattering, whatever “flaws” or “faults” the object of my desire might have, they somehow disappear in the kind gaze of my desire.

Of course back when I had an opinion, I much preferred Penthouse to Playboy. I like tits fine, but for me the real treat lies further South. Playboy always seem vaguely gynophobic, while Penthouse was lustily gynophilic! But in either case, back in the “golden age” of these magazines, you could actually see photographs where (a small aspect of) the subject of sex was treated with the care and craft that is devoted to things like food or clothing; and seeing some these photos again reminded me of the promise that porn once seemed to hold – that someday soon we would see sexuality, our own raw fleshy need to connect, rendered with that same loving eye.

Mr. Blue closes his review by saying:

“[Describing the end of the film] Back at the interview, both note that as adult film stars, they have had “sex” on camera, but not “sex,” as Damon says. If you see Damon’s face as he says this, you’ll know the difference. What was just shown was their version of sex, rather than porno sex. However, they once again express an exhibitionist side in saying that they hope not only gay men, but also woman and even straight men can see this and “get some ideas,” learn about sex from two gay men who seem to honestly love each other.

“Shot by Tony and Peggy Comstock (I’m assuming Peggy is a woman, which perhaps does make the statements above even more true), the scene here is revealing and trusting by Damon and Hunter in allowing the viewer into their private life. The scene is rather short [19 minutes] and purposely unglamorous, so it’s often hard to know what really went on [I think he means “Is this real reality or fake reality?”), but it is clear that these two men are doing something different than just fucking for the camera. There is emotion here, not faked, not acted, but truthful. It’s an alternative to porn. Not better, not worse, just a different side. Reality porn, so to speak.”

Or course I am very happy and very flattered by Brent’s thoughtful review, that he’s seen and appreciated the care and enthusiasm, that “loving eye” that we bring to our work. (You can read the rest of of Brent’s review here.) But it also makes me feel a little wistful. How is it that loving, crafted images of sex became the “alternative”, the exception, instead of the rule?

Last Chance for Cheap Gay Porn

Tuesday, February 14th, 2006

In mere hours Peggy will be updating the Damon and Hunter: Doing it Together listings on our website and DVD shop. You only have a few hours left to order Damon and Hunter for $12.95.

By the end of business today, the price will go up to $24.95, and we’ll be announcing a shipping date. Will also be announcing a slippery little extra that will be including with all full-priced orders of Damon and Hunter.

So order now and get a great DVD for only $12.95, or wait till tonight and get a great gift with your purchase!

The Comstock Films Video PodcastXana and Dax: When Opposites Attract, Episode 5

Tuesday, February 14th, 2006

Happy Valentine’s Day to the loved and the love-lorn. It’s time for another installment of the Comstock Films Video Podcast!

Today brings us episode 5 of Xana and Dax: When Opposites Attract.

Now that we’ve had a chance to get to know our lovely couple, the talking stops and the loving starts in earnest. In this episode we’ll see Xana and Dax kissing as they slowly undress each other. No hurrying â they’re going to take the time to do it right.

For your iPod or iTunes:
pcast://feeds.comstockfilms.com/ComstockFilmsVideoPodcast

All others:
http://feeds.comstockfilms.com/ComstockFilmsVideoPodcast

And don’t forget, if you like what you see, you can get the entire film on DVD from The Comstock Films DVD Shop.

Enjoy!

Your Sucky Valentine

Saturday, February 11th, 2006

Peggy and I are at the point in our middleclass, suburban, heterosexual lives where we are vastly outnumbered by our dependents – cats, dogs, and not least of all, children. Add to that the obligations of running an independent film company, and sometimes it feels a little busy around here. I’m not complaining, not at all. My life is lush and abundent to the point of overflowing. But sometimes it seems like we spend more energy on other people’s sex than on our own.

However, last night our eldest was away at a sleepover, giving us the illusion of having the house to ourselves (if you don’t count that cats complaining about the quality of their fodder, the larger dog snorning and the smaller dog yelping, and our infant daughter refusing to be left alone for more than 37 minutes at a time) and had ourselves a lovely little early Valentine’s Day. We opened a bottle of wine and I made a quick garlic shrimp and pasta.

“How did I get to be a mother of two?” say Peggy with a mixture of sardonisism and disbelief as she worked her way to bottom of her second glass.

When her glass was empty I showed her, or at least something approximating the procedure. It was a little sucky, and a little fucky, and altogether very nice. And that was Valentine’s Day at Casa Comstock.

For an slightly more sardonic take on February 14, check out My Sucky Valentine, a fundraiser for San Francisco Sex Information, and hosted by the sardonic, but always lovable Thomas Roche. It’s tonight, February 11, at the Center for Sex and Culture.

If you go, you are encouraged to wear their sexiest, skimpiest, kinkiest sleazewear. This year’s event is on a “Gangster of Love” (some people call me Maurice!) theme.

Tales of sexual woe will come from Eros Zine columnist Tori Ann McCabre as well as Carol Queen, Thea Hillman, Daphne Gottlieb, Violet Blue, Mistress Morgana, mi blue, and Simon Sheppard, as well as Mr. Roche himself.

There will also be special dance performances from Bombshell Betty and Lady Monster Burlesque — who will be performing both a hard-edged modern dance set to her own track from the forthcoming Revolting Cocks album as well as more traditional burlesque.

The doors open at 8pm, the show starts at 9pm, they won’t kick you out until 1am.

JustUsBoys.com Loves Damon and Hunter!

Friday, February 10th, 2006

Over on the JustUsBoys.com blog, JD says:

Comstock Films is just about to release an intimate film featuring two of our favorite porn performers and real life lovers, Damon DeMarco & Hunter James. Comstock sent us a screener DVD and I really enjoyed the scenes of loving, natural sex interspersed between interview clips of the boys talking about their relationship and sex life. Unlike a typical studio release, this film turns us into voyeurs by letting us peek into the bedroom of these two beautiful men.

Thanks JD!