Archive for April, 2006

Teach Me Tonight…

Thursday, April 27th, 2006



I spent some time on the phone yesterday with Bill Stackhouse, the director of the Institute for Gay Men’s Health at GMHC. They had requested we send over a few copies of Damon and Hunter: Doing it Together for their education and outreach, and I was curious to hear how the film was going to be used.

What Mr. Stackhouse told me is that he thought the film would be particularly valuable with men who are not yet having anal sex, but are curious about it. Bill felt that between the frank depiction of Damon taking Hunter anally (including lubing up and donning a condom), and the candid testimony, it would help these men get a more realistic impression of how anal sex happens in real life than they might get from other sources.

We’re also sending a few copies out to San Francisco Sex Information a sex information hotline that’s been serving the Bay Area for over 30 years. For much the same reasons cited by Bill Stackhouse,Thomas Roche thought D&H would be a good tool for volunteer education (M&J and X&D are already in the SFSI library). There are precious few resources, straight, gay, or lesbian that show people having “everyday” sex.

Of course our films aren’t convieved of, or offered as educational experiences. My hope is simply to entertain and arouse; two noble purposes in and of themselves, but too often given the short shrift when the subject is sex! But it’s great to hear that our (hopefully entertaining and arousing) films can also educate and inform people about sex in a positive way!

DNA Mag Explores Reality Porn with Damon and Hunter

Wednesday, April 26th, 2006

Says DNA Editor Luke Malone:

With the mantra: “Porn is sex without love and Hollywood is love without sex,” Tony Comstock has tried to reach a middle ground – and he has. Comstock films capture real couples having sex and splices that footage with an interview about their lives. The result is an engaging, documentary-like pornographic feature that gets you thinking as much as it gets you off. Damon DeMarco and Hunter James are the company’s first gay couple, appearing in newly released title Damon And Hunter: Doing It Together.”

Damon and Hunter represents a number of firsts for us; our first gay couple, our first shot-on-film title, our first 16:9 anamorphic widescreen release. Now it’s our first mention magazine cover too!

Thank you DNA!

It’s Here!

Tuesday, April 25th, 2006

Finally!

And about goddamn time too!

Sex on Film

Tuesday, April 25th, 2006

Sunday I had the privilage and the pleasure of chatting with Christophe and Diana for an upcoming episode of Blowfish Radio

One the long bus ride into the city to meet them I watch Cinema Paradiso. On the long bus ride back out I ordered I Am Curious, Yellow, I Am Curious, Blue, Nine Songs, The Dreamers, and Intimacy. I guess I should have got Last Tango in Paris while I was at it.

The Comstock Films Video Podcast - Ashley & Kisha, The Trailer

Monday, April 24th, 2006

Hello again, it’s time for another installment of The Comstock Films Video Podcast!

The last episode of “Xana and Dax” marked the end of Comstock Films standard definition 4:3 video production. From here on out it’s shot on film, 16:9 widescreen shows only, and honestly we’re not quite sure how that works with the iPod’s 4:3 aspect ratio screen. Will our shows get letterbox bars? Panned and scanned? Or vertically stretch? Of course there’s little doubt the next interation of the iPod will have a 16:9 aspect ratio screen, and all of our upcoming titles will fit right into that like a hand into a glove.

Speaking of a hand into a glove, here’s the trailer for our upcoming lesbian title “Ashley and Kisha: The Right Fit”. In it Kisha describes how in the past, finger play did absolutely nothing for her, so she absolutely couldn’t imagine how a relationship with a woman would be physically satisfying. Luckily for her (and us!), Ashley is an absolute expert at touching all the right places.

Feel free to touch yourself while you watch “Ashley and Kisha: The Right Fit”

For your iPod or iTunes:
pcast://feeds.comstockfilms.com/ComstockFilmsVideoPodcast

All others:
http://feeds.comstockfilms.com/ComstockFilmsVideoPodcast

Enjoy!

Nina Hartley Reveals the Secret Formula for Making Boring Porn

Sunday, April 23rd, 2006

Other than my own productions, I’ve never been on a porn set. Everything I know about how other people shoot explicit sex comes from discussions with porn makers and performers, and from what I can infer from looking at the results; and mostly what I can infer is that “the formula” for making porn is very different from making love, or even for having good sex.

Marie and Jack alluded to this during their interview in Marie and Jack: A Hardcore Love Story. When they made their decision to pursue a porn career, they rented a few porn videos to get a better idea of what would be expected of them:

JACK: We only started watching so that we knew what we were supposed to be doing. Like if we were going to work for a particular company, we’d rent one of their movies to see, you know, how they shot.

MARIE: Sometimes, it’s funny, we’d watch and we’d be like [Marie makes a blank expression] wow, this is really boring.

JACK: There were some companies…it’s really sad…you could count…okay five minutes of this, now that…now I’ll flip over…

MARIE: It was like the same positions every time; doggie, missionary, reverse.

You can see this passage on our video podcast in Episode 1 of Marie and Jack: A Hardcore Love Story

Responding on her bulletin board to a fan’s lament that contemporary porn lacks spontaneity, Nina Hartley breaks down today’s typical approach to shooting a sex scene even further. Says Nina:

Yeah, things were different when I started.

Mainly, the “formula” hadn’t been created yet, so there was a lot more spontaneity in a scene: you fucked in a position for as long as you wanted and then moved to the next one, until the director said that you were done.

Now, it goes like this:

oral one way: 3.5 minutes each, hard and soft
oral the other way: 3.5 minutes, ditto
vaginal position one: 3.5 minutes, ditto
vaginal position two: 3/5 minutes, ditto
anal position one (if applicable): 3.5 minutes (no soft core)
anal position two (ditto): 3.5 minutes (ditto)

Plus stopping for stills after each position.

That’s for features.

In gonzo, they’re not much different, but they’ll do all the positions up to the pop shot, and then stop and go back and get stills for each positon (better remember what they were!).

It gets boring, certainly.

It does sound boring.

Our approach to shooting a sex scene is a little different. From Hunter James’ interview in the May issue of DNA Magazine:

DNA: You’ve had sex on camera before. Can you tell us about your previous experiences and how they differ from Damon and Hunter: Doing it Together?

HUNTER: When you make porn for a studio there is usually a lot of direction: suck his cock, move your hand out of the shot, say this and say that. For this they just turned on the cameras and let us do what we do normally, without interruptions.

In the behind the scenes featurette Damon and Hunter: The Making of a Love Scene, which is included on the Damon and Hunter: Doing it Together DVD, Peggy and I lift our skirts a little, reveal our secret formula as it were.

When you watch The Making of a Love Scene, you’ll see that our approach is rather different when compared to what Marie and Jack or Nina Hartley describe. It’s born out of my background as a documentary filmmaker, which is mostly about finding interesting people in interesting situations, and then doing our best to stay out of the way while we try and keep up.

It’s not the only way to shoot a sex scene. It might not even be the best way. But it’s not boring, at least not to me. I don’t think the results are boring either, and I hope when you see our films, you’ll agree!

Short Bus/Small World

Saturday, April 22nd, 2006

Perhaps the most promising encounter I had at last weekend’s Q-Me Con was meeting Paul Stovall, a New York based actor and writer. He came up to me after the panel and said some very nice things, and we chatted too briefly. When I got home there was a very nice e-mail waiting for me, saying among other nice things “I think that if your talent comes anywhere close to your intelligence, then there is something really revolutionary probably going on with your work.”

Flattery will get you everywhere.

Paul and I ended up having a really great chat on the phone, mostly about his smart script ideas for a multi-camera street shooting film production concept I’ve been noodling about for a couple of years. One of the things I learned about Paul is that he’s in John Cameron Mitchell’s upcoming Short Bus, a film that for several years went under the working title of The Sex Film Project, and is reported to be “a real film with real sex”. (Paul is a tall, well muscled, and good looking. Let’s hope he’s in one of the sex scenes!)

I have been a huge admired of Mitchell since seeing Hedwig and the Angry Inch. It is, in a word, fantastic. I used to see posters for the stage show around New York, but not being a go out to a show person, I didn’t see it. I’m deeply regretful. But at least I got to see the movie, and you should too!

If anyone can close the real sex/real film gap, I think it’s Mitchell, and as envious I might be of him and his talent (true green monster style jealousy!) I’m hoping Short Bus is a smashing success. First and foremost, I’d like to see another great film from the mind of John Cameron Mitchell. Secondly, Mitchell’s spent years on this film, mostly raising money for it, mostly because investors are leery of sinking money into a project that has explicit sex in it (the budget figure I heard was $2.5M, or about four times the budget of porn blockbuster Pirates) If Short Bus succeeds, then maybe on Mitchell’s next outing he’ll be able to spend less time on raising money, and more time on making the movie.

Now let’s draw the circle a little tighter.

The Director of Photography for both Hedwig and Short Bus is Frank DeMarco. I had a chat with Frank back in 2003 about Ultra16, a 16mm 16:9 variant he developed. It’s a less expensive conversion than Super16 because the optical center of the camera doesn’t have to be moved, and because nearly all 16mm lenses will cover the Ultra16 image area. You simply grind the gate out between the perfs and presto, 16:9 on your Bolex, K-3, ACL or any other standard 16mm camera with standard 16mm lenses. I had just purchased 3 ACLs and a bunch of 16mm glass, plus I had a K-3 that I wanted to make 16:9 capable; all in all about $10K worth of machine work going the Super16 route, so I was really curious about Ultra16.

The catch is that you need a very specialized expensive bit of gear on the telecine end. Each gate size – 16mm, Super16, 35mm, Technoscope (perf non anamorphic 2.35), etc – needs it’s own gate on the Rank or Spirit or whatever machine you’re doing your film transfer on, and that’s where Ultra16 died. Although Frank had an Ultra16 gate made for his Arriflex and it worked perfectly, not enough people got on board, so no Ultra16 liquid gate for transfers. Frank’s opinion was that with the improvement in film emulsions since he first had the idea, if you wanted to do 16:9 on the cheap it made more sense to crop the top and bottom of the normal 1.33 16mm frame in telecine. A few weeks later my ACLs went out for Super16 conversion. One of these days like to do the K3 so I have a rugged, spring-driven Super16 camera as backup for those “back-of-the-beyond” projects.

(Where are you going Tony?)

It’s the DeMarco connection.

When Peggy and I shot Damon DeMarco and Hunter James it was our first outing with our Super16 modified ACLs, and as far as I know, the first time that an extended explicit gay sex scene has been captured on film since pornographers stopped using film in favor of video over 25 years ago.

This morning I’m up early, sitting with my infant daughter on my lap, reading blogs and trying to let my wife get a little quality sleep and I’m on Damon Demarco’s Blog, and there are a bunch of pictures of John Cameron Mitchell wearing the same blue striped shirt at several parties spanning several years.

This I can dig. Also in 2003, while I was in the middle of producing a film that saw me doing about 65K miles of air-travel, I found a really great deal on blue polo shirts at one of the discount clothing stores on the North side of 34th Street. I bought 12 of them (at $8/each) and now when I have to travel somewhere I just pile the appropriate number in my roll-aboard and a few pairs of khakis and I’m done. I might look like a BestBuy sales associate, but it’s one less thing to worry about when I’m going somewhere.

Wait now, we’re almost home.

I am 99 44/100% sure that when I met Paul Stovall last Sunday at Q-Me Con, he was wearing a blue polo shirt.

Do you believe in coincidence? I used to.

Ell’s Hardcore Love Review

Thursday, April 20th, 2006

If you’re a reader of this blog, then you should also be a reader of Ell’s Wilfuldamage Blog.

Ell is the brassiest broad I know. She loves men, she love sex, she loves cocks and cunts and cum; loves all of it enough to be a little wounded by the shabbiness that depictions of sex are afforded.

Like me, she takes it personally, and why shouldn’t we?

If there are no good movies about how good and wholesome sex is, there’s an implication that caring too much about sex is silly, that thinking too much about sex is silly, and that wanting to make or to see films of good sex is silly too.

But hearing Ell’s very nice voice read these very nice words makes me feel a little less silly.

Ell’s review of Marie and Jack: A Hardcore Love Story

XFactor Says Damon and Hunter is a Keeper!

Wednesday, April 19th, 2006

Says the Arizona-based gay men’s magazine:

Much of the film alternates between a filmed interview with the celebrity couple and the sex scene. During the interview segment, you learn how Damon and Hunter met, as well as many details of their day-to-day life, including how they juggle having a personal, private life with having individual porn careers. I was somewhat astonished and incredulous (yet satisfied) to hear that they still manage to sleep together every night.

Fans of Damon and Hunter should delight in the sheer amount of themselves they share in the interview and the frankness of their comments about themselves, their friends and family, and the evolution of their personal and sexual relationship.

Once the interview concludes [the] sex scene is presented without interruption, followed by an epilog in which Damon and Hunter make distinctions between “porn sex” and real gay sex.

Damon and Hunter fills a noticeable gap in adult erotic entertainment by filming a popular and extremely attractive real-life couple expressing their love and sexuality in a natural way.

Thank you XFactor!

The Heart of the Matter

Tuesday, April 18th, 2006

Since speaking on Sunday, I’ve had a bunch of really nice notes show up in my inbox. Here’s the nicest part of the nicest note:

I wanted to thank you for your presentation yesterday at Q-Me Con.

I appreciated what you said about wanting to make porn that you didnt see being made. I have felt the same way about most gay porn. I watch mostly amature stuff for the raw feeling.

I looked at your site and watched the preview for Damon and Hunter. I have to say that it gave me the most pleasant erotic sensations I have experinced in a long time. One thing I hear alot from gay men is that our biggest sex organ is our brain. I’ve always thought that wrong headed. I think the biggest sex organ is the heart. It seems your work is informed by that.

Not just informed by – it’s the very core of what I do!