<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: You&#8217;re Gonna Have To Face It, You&#8217;re Addicted to Porn</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.comstockfilms.com/blog/tony/2006/04/07/addicted-to-porn/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.comstockfilms.com/blog/tony/2006/04/07/addicted-to-porn/</link>
	<description>Real Talk About Making Real Sex Erotic Documentaries</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 02:58:58 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tony Comstock&#8217;s Blog &#187; Porn in HD, or Why When Porn Sucks the Media Sucks on it Harder</title>
		<link>http://www.comstockfilms.com/blog/tony/2006/04/07/addicted-to-porn/#comment-17283</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony Comstock&#8217;s Blog &#187; Porn in HD, or Why When Porn Sucks the Media Sucks on it Harder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 14:57:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.comstockfilms.com/blog/tony/2006/04/07/addicted-to-porn/#comment-17283</guid>
		<description>[...] Aparently that&#8217;s news enough for the New York Times to run yet another late to the party, disinformed and disinforming story about porn. Again I&#8217;m left wondering just what sort of porn the article&#8217;s author has been watching that this is news. Again I&#8217;m left with the suspicion that this in more of the mainstream media freebasing porn with precious little interest in the real story, or even the basic facts. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Aparently that&#8217;s news enough for the New York Times to run yet another late to the party, disinformed and disinforming story about porn. Again I&#8217;m left wondering just what sort of porn the article&#8217;s author has been watching that this is news. Again I&#8217;m left with the suspicion that this in more of the mainstream media freebasing porn with precious little interest in the real story, or even the basic facts. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony Comstock&#8217;s Blog &#187; The Secret Formula for Making Boring Porn, Part 2</title>
		<link>http://www.comstockfilms.com/blog/tony/2006/04/07/addicted-to-porn/#comment-14984</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony Comstock&#8217;s Blog &#187; The Secret Formula for Making Boring Porn, Part 2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2007 00:06:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.comstockfilms.com/blog/tony/2006/04/07/addicted-to-porn/#comment-14984</guid>
		<description>[...] So why do the New York Times, and PBS, and the AP keep reporting this nonsense? For the same reason people make porn; because it&#8217;s fun to go slumming, because it&#8217;s titilating to take an &#8220;unbiased&#8221; look at the &#8220;adult industry&#8221; because putting something &#8220;trashy&#8221; in the business section spices it up a little. And mostly, because no one&#8217;s checking the facts. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] So why do the New York Times, and PBS, and the AP keep reporting this nonsense? For the same reason people make porn; because it&#8217;s fun to go slumming, because it&#8217;s titilating to take an &#8220;unbiased&#8221; look at the &#8220;adult industry&#8221; because putting something &#8220;trashy&#8221; in the business section spices it up a little. And mostly, because no one&#8217;s checking the facts. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ell</title>
		<link>http://www.comstockfilms.com/blog/tony/2006/04/07/addicted-to-porn/#comment-364</link>
		<dc:creator>ell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Apr 2006 02:21:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.comstockfilms.com/blog/tony/2006/04/07/addicted-to-porn/#comment-364</guid>
		<description>I just had this sent to me via a stop censorship newslink - in response to the AP article - you may like it --http://www.stats.org/record.jsp?type=news&#38;ID=560</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just had this sent to me via a stop censorship newslink - in response to the AP article - you may like it &#8211;http://www.stats.org/record.jsp?type=news&amp;ID=560</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tony</title>
		<link>http://www.comstockfilms.com/blog/tony/2006/04/07/addicted-to-porn/#comment-362</link>
		<dc:creator>tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Apr 2006 15:46:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.comstockfilms.com/blog/tony/2006/04/07/addicted-to-porn/#comment-362</guid>
		<description>---People are so easily threatened. And I wouldn’t care except for the fact that their fear makes them idiots.---

If it were fear, I'd have more sympathy. I get scared sometimes, and I'm when scared I'm not entirely rational. And I see plenty of things in porn that scare me.

But as usual it's not fear, it's that lovely two-some that seem to follow naked ladies around like hungry dogs: greed and laziness.

Harmer is a lawyer, who at 71 thinks he's going to hit it big importing Chinese cars into the US (The cars still can't meet emission standards). But thanks to his "anti-porn crusade" going out all accross the AP wire, he's now a "Utah-based auto exective". Makes it sound like he heads a GM division in the beehive state, doesn't it?

But he's not. He's just a hustler looking to cash in on the cheap labor and lack of environmental protections in China.

Hammer is no different from pornographers who tack PhD on the end of their names, and Crary is no different from a dozen other journalists who "report" on this stuff without doing even a simple hour of Google research that would show that Harmer's never made a nickle selling cars, and that those "doctorates" are available to anyone with a $5,000 line of credit on their Visa card.

Of course the stories lose their punch when you take out "auto executive" or "Ph.D" out of them, so there's precious little inscentive for Crary to spend the 30 minutes it took me, someone with zero background in investigation, to find these things out. That's how thing like "porn is a 12, 15, 52 billion dollar a year business" get in print and stay in print.

A little more googling and we see that Hammer and our old friend Ed Messe have cooked up a little 501(c)(3) chicanery at http://www.lightedcandlesociety.org/leadership.html

Call me cynical, but this doesn't look like convictions, this looks like a chance to cozy up to an administration whose favorite whipping boy is porn, and whose favorite &lt;strike&gt;totalitarian regime&lt;/strike&gt; trading partner is China.

I doubt Ed needs the money, but I bet all this erototoxin nonsense has him thinking this is another chance for him to hear his name on the nightly news.

Make that three dogs: greedy, laziness, and self-aggrandizement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8212;People are so easily threatened. And I wouldn’t care except for the fact that their fear makes them idiots.&#8212;</p>
<p>If it were fear, I&#8217;d have more sympathy. I get scared sometimes, and I&#8217;m when scared I&#8217;m not entirely rational. And I see plenty of things in porn that scare me.</p>
<p>But as usual it&#8217;s not fear, it&#8217;s that lovely two-some that seem to follow naked ladies around like hungry dogs: greed and laziness.</p>
<p>Harmer is a lawyer, who at 71 thinks he&#8217;s going to hit it big importing Chinese cars into the US (The cars still can&#8217;t meet emission standards). But thanks to his &#8220;anti-porn crusade&#8221; going out all accross the AP wire, he&#8217;s now a &#8220;Utah-based auto exective&#8221;. Makes it sound like he heads a GM division in the beehive state, doesn&#8217;t it?</p>
<p>But he&#8217;s not. He&#8217;s just a hustler looking to cash in on the cheap labor and lack of environmental protections in China.</p>
<p>Hammer is no different from pornographers who tack PhD on the end of their names, and Crary is no different from a dozen other journalists who &#8220;report&#8221; on this stuff without doing even a simple hour of Google research that would show that Harmer&#8217;s never made a nickle selling cars, and that those &#8220;doctorates&#8221; are available to anyone with a $5,000 line of credit on their Visa card.</p>
<p>Of course the stories lose their punch when you take out &#8220;auto executive&#8221; or &#8220;Ph.D&#8221; out of them, so there&#8217;s precious little inscentive for Crary to spend the 30 minutes it took me, someone with zero background in investigation, to find these things out. That&#8217;s how thing like &#8220;porn is a 12, 15, 52 billion dollar a year business&#8221; get in print and stay in print.</p>
<p>A little more googling and we see that Hammer and our old friend Ed Messe have cooked up a little 501(c)(3) chicanery at <a href="http://www.lightedcandlesociety.org/leadership.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.lightedcandlesociety.org/leadership.html</a></p>
<p>Call me cynical, but this doesn&#8217;t look like convictions, this looks like a chance to cozy up to an administration whose favorite whipping boy is porn, and whose favorite <strike>totalitarian regime</strike> trading partner is China.</p>
<p>I doubt Ed needs the money, but I bet all this erototoxin nonsense has him thinking this is another chance for him to hear his name on the nightly news.</p>
<p>Make that three dogs: greedy, laziness, and self-aggrandizement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chelsea girl</title>
		<link>http://www.comstockfilms.com/blog/tony/2006/04/07/addicted-to-porn/#comment-361</link>
		<dc:creator>chelsea girl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Apr 2006 15:02:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.comstockfilms.com/blog/tony/2006/04/07/addicted-to-porn/#comment-361</guid>
		<description>Sorry, the first sentence in the penultimate paragraph should read "And...there's a whole lot of no connection." See what happens when I don't proofread?

I should be spanked. With a Strunk &#38; White. Vigorously. And perhaps on film.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, the first sentence in the penultimate paragraph should read &#8220;And&#8230;there&#8217;s a whole lot of no connection.&#8221; See what happens when I don&#8217;t proofread?</p>
<p>I should be spanked. With a Strunk &amp; White. Vigorously. And perhaps on film.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chelsea girl</title>
		<link>http://www.comstockfilms.com/blog/tony/2006/04/07/addicted-to-porn/#comment-360</link>
		<dc:creator>chelsea girl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Apr 2006 14:59:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.comstockfilms.com/blog/tony/2006/04/07/addicted-to-porn/#comment-360</guid>
		<description>I love this kind of conservative ideology dressed up in the Land's End khaki of social concern ("love" as in "am apalled by").

A few times in my teaching career, I've given essay assignments that require students to explore various positions on ideas such as violent music causes violence. They go out, they do their happy research, they compile article on article that supports the relationship between, usually, hard-core rap and increased violence in children.

And then I bring in a copy of Eminem's "97 Bonnie and Clyde" and we listen to it. We analyze the lyrics and we talk about how often it has come up in their research, which, it turns out, is quite often. Then I bring out the Billboard charts for the song's CD and we talk about the numbers of people who bought the album and what we would expect, given the relationships that all these journalists have stated, to happen in terms of rates of American violence.

And...there's a whole no connection. Which then leads into why journalists and others would seem so committed to saying that this kind of music--or video games or porn or whatever--is bad for society.

People are so easily threatened. And I wouldn't care except for the fact that their fear makes them idiots.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love this kind of conservative ideology dressed up in the Land&#8217;s End khaki of social concern (&#8221;love&#8221; as in &#8220;am apalled by&#8221;).</p>
<p>A few times in my teaching career, I&#8217;ve given essay assignments that require students to explore various positions on ideas such as violent music causes violence. They go out, they do their happy research, they compile article on article that supports the relationship between, usually, hard-core rap and increased violence in children.</p>
<p>And then I bring in a copy of Eminem&#8217;s &#8220;97 Bonnie and Clyde&#8221; and we listen to it. We analyze the lyrics and we talk about how often it has come up in their research, which, it turns out, is quite often. Then I bring out the Billboard charts for the song&#8217;s CD and we talk about the numbers of people who bought the album and what we would expect, given the relationships that all these journalists have stated, to happen in terms of rates of American violence.</p>
<p>And&#8230;there&#8217;s a whole no connection. Which then leads into why journalists and others would seem so committed to saying that this kind of music&#8211;or video games or porn or whatever&#8211;is bad for society.</p>
<p>People are so easily threatened. And I wouldn&#8217;t care except for the fact that their fear makes them idiots.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
