<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Fails Because Google Doesn&#8217;t Know What &#8220;Romantica&#8221; Is.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.comstockfilms.com/blog/tony/2007/01/03/google-fails-because-google-doesnt-know-what-romantica-is/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.comstockfilms.com/blog/tony/2007/01/03/google-fails-because-google-doesnt-know-what-romantica-is/</link>
	<description>Real Talk About Making Real Sex Erotic Documentaries</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 00:55:19 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Lauren</title>
		<link>http://www.comstockfilms.com/blog/tony/2007/01/03/google-fails-because-google-doesnt-know-what-romantica-is/#comment-16143</link>
		<dc:creator>Lauren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 22:38:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.comstockfilms.com/blog/tony/2007/01/03/google-fails-because-google-doesnt-know-what-romantica-is/#comment-16143</guid>
		<description>I don't think they mean monogamous in the sense of two people but in the sense of however many people are in the relationship are comitted to each other at the end of the story. 

I write menages for them so it's three as well as two and I know other authors who write more than three.

I'd say, under EC's system your movies would be an E - that's where my books are. It's not about kink as much as more graphic terms and the place sex has in the overall story. 

And romantica is a trademarked term owned by EC so I'd say no, it's not a family friendly search term because it's adult material. Good adult material, don't get me wrong, but you have to be over 18 to buy the books.

And I don't write porn. I have no problem with people who do, but in my opinion, porn exists for the sole purpose of titilation. My books are story first with sex in them, the object is the story and then then the sex. I wouldn't be doing my job if the readers weren't a bit tingly when they finished, but the presence of a menage or an orgy doesn't in and of itself, equate to porn. And you'll never find any questionable consent in my books, ever. It's something that makes my skin crawl.

Anyway, I totally agree that my readers would love your movies and I tell them so all the time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think they mean monogamous in the sense of two people but in the sense of however many people are in the relationship are comitted to each other at the end of the story. </p>
<p>I write menages for them so it&#8217;s three as well as two and I know other authors who write more than three.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d say, under EC&#8217;s system your movies would be an E - that&#8217;s where my books are. It&#8217;s not about kink as much as more graphic terms and the place sex has in the overall story. </p>
<p>And romantica is a trademarked term owned by EC so I&#8217;d say no, it&#8217;s not a family friendly search term because it&#8217;s adult material. Good adult material, don&#8217;t get me wrong, but you have to be over 18 to buy the books.</p>
<p>And I don&#8217;t write porn. I have no problem with people who do, but in my opinion, porn exists for the sole purpose of titilation. My books are story first with sex in them, the object is the story and then then the sex. I wouldn&#8217;t be doing my job if the readers weren&#8217;t a bit tingly when they finished, but the presence of a menage or an orgy doesn&#8217;t in and of itself, equate to porn. And you&#8217;ll never find any questionable consent in my books, ever. It&#8217;s something that makes my skin crawl.</p>
<p>Anyway, I totally agree that my readers would love your movies and I tell them so all the time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tony</title>
		<link>http://www.comstockfilms.com/blog/tony/2007/01/03/google-fails-because-google-doesnt-know-what-romantica-is/#comment-14954</link>
		<dc:creator>tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 18:40:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.comstockfilms.com/blog/tony/2007/01/03/google-fails-because-google-doesnt-know-what-romantica-is/#comment-14954</guid>
		<description>I've got no problem with Google classifying Comstock Films as adult. What I want to know is why they thing 'romantica' is a "family friendly search" when the second return is Ellora's Cave!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve got no problem with Google classifying Comstock Films as adult. What I want to know is why they thing &#8216;romantica&#8217; is a &#8220;family friendly search&#8221; when the second return is Ellora&#8217;s Cave!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Drew Black - Adult DVD Talk</title>
		<link>http://www.comstockfilms.com/blog/tony/2007/01/03/google-fails-because-google-doesnt-know-what-romantica-is/#comment-14953</link>
		<dc:creator>Drew Black - Adult DVD Talk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 18:37:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.comstockfilms.com/blog/tony/2007/01/03/google-fails-because-google-doesnt-know-what-romantica-is/#comment-14953</guid>
		<description>It's pizza boxes.

AdWords has an agent that goes out and scans the content of the page that the ad links to.  That's part of how it determines if the ad is adult in nature.  Take all of the adult words out of the page you're linking to and your ad won't be classified as adult.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s pizza boxes.</p>
<p>AdWords has an agent that goes out and scans the content of the page that the ad links to.  That&#8217;s part of how it determines if the ad is adult in nature.  Take all of the adult words out of the page you&#8217;re linking to and your ad won&#8217;t be classified as adult.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
