Comments on: Stacy Grenrock Woods Is a Cunt

By: tony

tony — Mon, 10 Dec 2007 13:16:39 +0000

Diana, Essin, thanks for your comments!

I can understand why a person might take exception to my use of the word cunt. It was not chosen without deliberation and intent. My apologies to you and any others who are offended.

By: Essin' Em

Essin' Em — Mon, 03 Dec 2007 01:16:11 +0000

I can’t believe that complete and total asshattery and the way both you and Violet were misquoted and mistreated at the hands of Esquire and Stacey.

Although I wouldn’t say she’s a cunt. I think cunts are wonderful and love tasting them and seeing them and playing with them and fucking them. Calling her a cunt is insulting. She is pond scum, a disgrace to “journalism” and the field of writing.

I wish you much better luck in the future with being quoted.

By: Diana

Diana — Mon, 03 Dec 2007 00:27:23 +0000

I understand the disgust you bear for the sleazy-trashy commercial porn makers and marketers, and the disapointment that your art (it is art) not being widely appreciated and understood (but it will be one day). And I pretty much agree with nearly all of your comments in this post. But. . . your headline is a cheap shot. Using cunt as a pejorative, not simply as a descriptive slang, is right up the alley of the sleazy-trashy-misogynist porn kings. It cheapens and diminishes the rightful power of your expressed thoughts. Your ideas deserve a better headline. Your targets deserve to be skewered with sharply expressed ideas, not ad hominem attacks.
There’s nothing else like your work out there. It’s real people, real honest beauty, real passion, real love, real sex. I’m looking forward to the next release. Keep it real.