<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Penis = Safe; Clitoris = Not Safe. (Why can&#8217;t the Googlebot find a single SafeSearch return for [clitoris]?)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.comstockfilms.com/blog/tony/2008/11/21/penis-safe-clitoris-not-safe/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.comstockfilms.com/blog/tony/2008/11/21/penis-safe-clitoris-not-safe/</link>
	<description>Real Talk About Making Real Sex Erotic Documentaries</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 17:15:12 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Learning to say no to HBO (and others.) &#124; The Art &#38; Business of Making Erotic Films</title>
		<link>http://www.comstockfilms.com/blog/tony/2008/11/21/penis-safe-clitoris-not-safe/comment-page-1/#comment-107704</link>
		<dc:creator>Learning to say no to HBO (and others.) &#124; The Art &#38; Business of Making Erotic Films</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 12:52:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.comstockfilms.com/blog/tony/?p=905#comment-107704</guid>
		<description>[...] of the Year, but the Chronicle wouldn&#8217;t link to my post, only to Susie Brights post about my post. But then a few weeks later Violet called me out in her Twittersexuality Chronicle column as a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of the Year, but the Chronicle wouldn&#8217;t link to my post, only to Susie Brights post about my post. But then a few weeks later Violet called me out in her Twittersexuality Chronicle column as a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google says the removal of clitoris from SafeSearch results is a &#8220;technical issue&#8221;. &#124; The Art &#38; Business of Making Erotic Films</title>
		<link>http://www.comstockfilms.com/blog/tony/2008/11/21/penis-safe-clitoris-not-safe/comment-page-1/#comment-96796</link>
		<dc:creator>Google says the removal of clitoris from SafeSearch results is a &#8220;technical issue&#8221;. &#124; The Art &#38; Business of Making Erotic Films</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 03:23:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.comstockfilms.com/blog/tony/?p=905#comment-96796</guid>
		<description>[...] Of course maybe it is a technical issue. After all, the mere misplacement of a &#8216;/&#8217; caused Google to classify every page on the World Wide Web as malware . Here&#8217;s hoping Google can get its bugs ironed out. If they do, maybe people will be able to use Google to find out the [clitoris] vs. [penis] story started on this blog. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Of course maybe it is a technical issue. After all, the mere misplacement of a &#8216;/&#8217; caused Google to classify every page on the World Wide Web as malware . Here&#8217;s hoping Google can get its bugs ironed out. If they do, maybe people will be able to use Google to find out the [clitoris] vs. [penis] story started on this blog. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chipkali</title>
		<link>http://www.comstockfilms.com/blog/tony/2008/11/21/penis-safe-clitoris-not-safe/comment-page-1/#comment-93466</link>
		<dc:creator>chipkali</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Nov 2008 22:36:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.comstockfilms.com/blog/tony/?p=905#comment-93466</guid>
		<description>Am I alone in finding the term "vajayjay" vaguely offensive???

I know that linguistically speaking I have strange rules (I am not really offended by the c word, but call it a minge and you get whallopped), but the referal to genitals by some childish word creeps me out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Am I alone in finding the term &#8220;vajayjay&#8221; vaguely offensive???</p>
<p>I know that linguistically speaking I have strange rules (I am not really offended by the c word, but call it a minge and you get whallopped), but the referal to genitals by some childish word creeps me out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
